Don’t believe the Kindle sales numbers … Amazon doesn’t
The Kindle sales numbers reported by TechCrunch on August 1st have been refuted by Amazon officials says Tim Beuneman, analyst from McAdams Wright Ragen. The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reports the news came from Beuneman via “an e-mailed note based on meetings with management.”
Amazon officials gave McAdams Wright Ragen analysts the impression that high-end estimates on Kindle sales reported by TechCrunch and a Citigroup analyst are not reasonable.
Amazon managers “told us that the Kindle is definitely selling very well, but they also said the analysts and reporters giving out these extremely high estimates ‘did not run them by company,” Bueneman wrote.
Extremely high? Interesting choice of words.
I was suspect of the numbers when they were reported but took them at face value. Now, it seems I should have listened to the nagging voice in my head that said the numbers were too high. If Kindle sales were that good, Amazon would be on the roof crowing about the news to anyone who would listen.
My post on those first numbers was restrained. Let’s face it, TechCrunch had a number from a source while I simply had a gut feeling, back of the envelope calculations and socio-economic theories. I won’t make that same mistake twice.
Kindle sales aren’t anywhere near this figure based on Beuneman’s statement, coupled with the ’small amount’ of New York Times subscriptions sold on the Kindle, and the fact that Kindle has only been available for sale (by my calculations) just shy of 5 months.
Amazon also reiterated that it would have a student Kindle in the near future. I’ve advocated for a textbook Kindle. The focus on the textbook market is smart, but also an admission of sorts that the Kindle is not finding a mainstream market.
Textbook publishers might not be willing to change their pricing structures, and secondary market players both online and offline, will not want to give up the lucrative used textbook market. I’d feel more confident if Amazon had a positive relationship with publishers, but they don’t.
Finally, will the iPhone 3G problems make consumers more hesitant to try Kindle? I’d surmised that Kindle would benefit from positive experiences with the iPod, but they could face similar negative effects from the latest iPhone launch. Not to mention that little thing called the economy.
It’s all conjecture until Amazon decides to be a bit more transparent.
August 23rd, 2008 at 7:30 pm
Amazon’s Bezos touts Kindle’s ability to supply newspapers as a primary justification for the device.
Bezos: “The convenience of having your newspapers pushed to you full text—newspapers and blogs—is fantastic.”
And looking at Amazon’s website we see that the NY Times ranks as the #1 Amazon “Bestselling” Kindle Newspaper (beating even the WSJ):
http://www.amazon.com/s/qid=1219542524/ref=sr_st?rs=165389011&page=1&rh=n%3A165389011&sort=salesrank
So, if the NY Times, the #1 “Bestselling” Amazon Kindle Newspaper subs suck, as the NY Times executives say so themselves, well then this reinforces the trend toward overall weak Kindle unit sales.
August 31st, 2008 at 2:13 am
[…] Don’t believe the Kindle sales numbers … Amazon doesn’t - Used Book Blog […]
October 16th, 2008 at 4:31 am
[…] Don’t believe the Kindle sales numbers … Amazon doesn’t - Used Book Blog […]
November 28th, 2008 at 2:57 pm
[…] If customer demand had been that heavy Amazon would have been a lot more vocal about it and wouldn’t have called the projections floating around the Internet “extremely high“. […]
December 27th, 2008 at 12:38 am
[…] meme making its way around the Internet. Amazon quickly responded to these figures and deemed the Kindle estimates ‘extremely high’. Not inaccurate or slightly off base but ‘extremely […]